The FUD Factor 2


This article, originally published by Al Zucaro on, is preserved for historical purposes by Massive Impressions Online Marketing in Boca Raton.
If there are questions or concerns with the content please e-mail

Response to Sun Sentinel Editorial

The Sun Sentinel newspaper is trying to create Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) regarding “City of Boca Raton Question”. This is the last question on the November 8th ballot. Bocawatch has performed a fact check on assertions made in an editorial the paper ran on October 21, 2016 and is reporting on three significant misrepresentations.

The format we used is the same as the political fact checking site, i.e., assertions are scored using a Truth-O-Meter. The three editorial assertions are analyzed below.

Sun Sentinel Says…

“Then-Mayor Susan Whelchel confirms the city bought the Wildflower site for $7.5 million in 2009 expressly to lease it, so the land could bring in revenue from a restaurant. The land never has been a park.”


Many sources confirm that this is a ridiculous statement, including:

Then-Mayor Whelchel:

Then-Deputy Mayor Baronoff


Then-Councilman Majhess


Also, the City conducted an electronic survey in the summer of 2011 asking citizens for ideas on uses for the Wildflower parcel. The City held a workshop as well in October, 2011 to review the results of the survey and get more input on uses for the parcel. If the decision was to lease the parcel to a restaurant at purchase time, why were the citizen survey and workshop held?

Sun Sentinel Says…

“There is no proposal for development on any city-owned waterfront park.”


This statement is very misleading since the last ballot question specifies city-owned waterfront land, not parks and there is a proposal for development on city-owned waterfront land. On November 8, 2013 Hillstone submitted a proposal to develop the Wildflower parcel:


Sun Sentinel Says…

“Start with money. In its current version, the lease could generate about $33 million in payments from Hillstone over 45 years. The city would pay the property taxes. If the ordinance succeeded in blocking the restaurant, residents would lose that money.”


This statement is very misleading because it does not provide a comprehensive view of the lease financials. When all city costs and the time value of money are included in the financial analysis, the lease results in a financial LOSS to the city. That is, the $33 million in payments received are more than totally offset by city costs required in the lease. Also, there is no cap on the ad valorem real estate taxes that the city is required to pay for 45 years. This is also a significant financial risk to the city.

In summary, the Sun Sentinel editorial on the last ballot question contains numerous ridiculous and false assertions. Please do not accept their information without first performing your due diligence. You should also not accept the above information without performing due diligence. All of the information provided above is documented in the site and the author of this article is willing to help anyone understand the details. Please vote YES for the Boca Raton ballot question and encourage your family and friends to do the same.

Please contact me with questions.

Previous articleWhite Paper III on Mizner 200
Next articleBoca Teeca Golf Course Update


  1. I’m a resident of Boca for 24 years. I’ve been coming here ,since 1983. “The Wildflower” was at it’s prime in the 80’s
    also Maxwell’s chop house was another great place.
    I was always under the impression, that the property was bought, to put a tax payer there to get revenue for the city.
    From a property, that was derelict for years w/ no revenue to the city.
    So, do we really need a postage stamp park on what ,100ft frontage ??
    We don’t need a park on the inter-coastal…………..WE HAVE ONE ! it’s called Spanish River ! the property stretches from the SR Bridge south to San Remo Club . I think it’s a little over a mile. Clean up the brush , make a beach the full length an people can canoe, paddle board, wind surf, kayak etc. what wrong with that ?

    • Hey John, the purpose of the first fact check in the article is to present evidence that there was not a plan for the Wildflower parcel when it was purchased. Please watch the videos and read the text. Regarding revenue to the City, the costs to the City of the recommended restaurant lease agreement are greater than the revenue, leading to a financial loss for the City and its citizens: /if-it-was-your-money-what-would-you-do-wait-it-is-your-money/
      Good idea on cleaning-up the Spanish River Park waterfront for improved recreation. Regarding usage of the Wildflower parcel, it should be up to you and the rest of the citizens to decide what to do. Check out what Deerfield is doing with Sullivan Park:

  2. The traffic in Boca is becoming ridiculous. Palmetto is gridlock and there are more enormous condos/apartments coming. Bottom line is Boca is becoming over developed and we need to think hard about any future development. Traffic is ruining the quality of life in BOCA.

  3. Too often in the debate of ballot question the terms park land, water front land and the Wildflower Property are used interchangeably. Thirteen seconds into the video interview with Mr. Wood, Mr. Zucaro talks about “commercializing park land on the intra-coastal”. Again in the same video at 5:21, Mr. Zucaro talks about voting yes to preserve the city parks from commercialization.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here