Adding Insult to Injury


The next time you are stuck in traffic, aghast at what has happened to the village formerly known as Boca Raton, think of this: if you are unlucky enough to be living in the “downtown” construction zone, it is time for you to pay your annual “beautification” assessment.


These ad valorem taxes, which can run to thousands of dollars if you live in an expensive condo, stem from decisions made by your City Council back in the nineties that the downtown area was in desperate need of infrastructure improvements. Miraculously, this same area morphed into the district covered by the Interim Design Guidelines zoning changes in 2008. So who really benefits from all that “beautification” spending?   You guessed it: the developers who are erecting those concrete monuments to bad taste almost everywhere you look.


All of this was supposed to have a happy ending. According to an independent evaluation funded by the City (entitled “Benefits Evaluation of the Boca Raton Visions 90 Special Assessment Program”) the economic benefits of the tax are as follows: increased land values, premium rents, increased retail sales, and reduced development costs. Of the four, only increased land values flow directly to downtown residents. The rest favor developers.


So this holiday season as you sit in traffic on one of downtown Boca’s five major arteries– there are only five, and they are not getting any wider– ask yourself if your taxes are actually paying for the beautification of Boca Raton. Or are we just paying ever-higher debt service which primarily serves the interests of developers.


It is the supreme irony that residents east of the Intracoastal are now demanding that all that “beautification” on Palmetto– the brick median, royal palms and all– be replaced by an additional lane for traffic. We are seeing the future and we are paying for it.


John C. Gore,








Previous articleFarewell to a Valuable City Advisory Board
Next articleDifferent Perspectives on Development


  1. The Downtown Special Assessment is paid only by downtown property owners and the assessment pays for the bonds that funded the Visions 90 Capital Improvement Program Ad valorem taxes, aka property taxes, were not used for V90 infrastructure improvements.

    While the V90 infrastructure improvements did include beautification elements (landscaping and irrigation, decorative light snd pavers, arches abd benches) vast majority of the funds were spent on roadway projects including all the side streets, federal highway, four laning Mizner Boulevard, new sidewalks and traffic signals and water sewer and drainage improvements V90 was not a beautification project..

    What’s really ironic is property owners east of the intercoastal on Palmetto Park Road want the same improvements made West Palmetto Park Road but they don’t want to have to pay for it through a special assessment.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here