Trump Pushes To End Senate ‘Blue Slips’ As GOP Confirms Judges At Record Pace
In just the past week, the Senate confirmed half a dozen of Trumpβs judicial nominees, continuing a streak thatβs left Democrats visibly frustrated.
Since the start of Trumpβs second term, 33 judges have sailed through confirmation β already eclipsing his entire first-term total. By comparison, during Trumpβs first year in office, the Senate confirmed 19 Article III judges, including Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.Β
While Senate Republicans are moving fast and confirming judges at a blistering pace, there are mounting calls to scrap one of the Senateβs oldest customs β the βblue slip.βΒ
The century-old practice has long allowed home-state senators to weigh in on judicial nominations before they advance, but Democrats have been abusing it, turning it into a de facto veto on nominees they donβt like.
Trump has wanted the tradition gone because of the way Democrats have abused it.
Last year, he reportedly told Senate Republicans to βget rid of blue slips, because, as a Republican President, I am unable to put anybody in office having to do with U.S. attorneys or having to do with judges.”
Some Republicans sympathize with Trumpβs view, seeing the blue slip as an outdated relic that slows confirmations.
But others see danger in dismantling another institutional guardrail.
βNuking the blue slip would be a huge mistake,β Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) told Fox News Digital, joining several colleagues warning that a short-term rules victory could backfire the next time Democrats control the Senate.
For them, the issue isnβt about speed β itβs about reciprocity.
They argue the GOP will one day need the same courtesy theyβre now being pressured to destroy.
While that is certainly true, like the filibuster, it is likely to be nuked by Democrats the next time theyβre in power if they feel this guardrail hampers their ability to get what they want. In fact, thatβs exactly why the blue slip started to get abused in the first place. In 2017, Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley was forced to reshape the practice after Democrats used it as a veto on Trumpβs judicial nominees during his first term.Β
Grassley noted at the time that the blue slip began as a βcourtesy to get insights on federal court nominees from home-state senators in an era when such information was hard to come by.β It was never, he argued, meant to give senators βveto power over the presidentβs judicial nominations.β Grassley also reminded Democrats that their predicament was self-inflicted. βDemocratic senatorsβ recent calls for an ahistorical interpretation of the blue slip courtesy stem from a decision they made in 2013 to end the 60-vote filibuster for lower court nominees. This move, often referred to as the βnuclear option,β effectively silenced half of the Senate during confirmation votes.
At the time, many Democratic senators argued it was unfair for a minority of senators to block nominees with majority support.β he wrote.
βNow that they are in the minority, Democrats are scrambling to cope with the fallout from their decision.β
That history lesson seems lost on much of Washington. For now, the tension within the GOP shows no signs of easing, and despite his earlier move, Grassley remains a proponent of blue slips in theory.
“Because it’s a question of 110 years, and everybody in the Senate wants to maintain the blue slip,” Grassley said.
That is likely wishful thinking. During the Biden years, Senate Democrats ignored the spirit of the tradition whenever it suited them, confirming 42 judges in the first year of Bidenβs presidency β a pace even faster than Trumpβs current term.
Β Trumpβs allies argue that the Presidentβs judicial agenda is too critical to be slowed by Senate traditions that Democrats themselves long abandoned.
Others, however, believe that retaliating by erasing every trace of procedural courtesy risks making future confirmations impossible when Democrats are back in power.
Β
Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/11/2026 – 18:50
