Default Action: directlink
Default Link Follow: nofollow
Default Link Target: newtab
Affiliate Code:
Default Link Color is defined : #555555
The Forgotten Trump Campaign Promise That Will Come Back To Haunt Republicans In The Midterms A mounting financial burden costing American families thousands of dollars a year is emerging as an overlooked issue in the 2026 midterm elections as new polling suggests that the expense of caring for aging relatives could influence voters in some of the nation's most competitive congressional races. While inflation, the Iran War and border security dominate the national debate, the growing cost of family caregiving has attracted comparatively little attention. An estimated 59 million Americans provide unpaid care for an adult relative, friend or neighbor, according to AARP. A recent Edward Jones study found that financial caregivers who are not fully reimbursed spend an average of $8,737 annually out of pocket, forcing difficult decisions about household budgets and long-term savings. The financial strain is also evident in retirement accounts. Research from the Employee Benefit Research Institute found that 34% of caregivers have less than $10,000 in savings and investments, compared with 25% of non-caregivers. Moreover, the AARP survey conducted across 43 competitive congressional districts found that 77% of likely voters age 50 and older said they would be more likely to support a candidate advocating tax credits for unpaid caregivers. Additionally, 75% expressed greater support for candidates backing assistance that allows relatives to remain in their homes rather than enter institutional care. Older Americans also appear especially motivated ahead of Election Day. The same survey found that 83% of voters age 50 and older described themselves as extremely motivated to vote, compared with 66% of younger voters. Trump Tax Credit When? President Donald Trump pledged to address the growing issue during his 2024 campaign, promising a tax credit for Americans caring for aging parents and other loved ones. "It's about time that they were recognized, right?" Trump asked during a Madison Square Garden rally at the time. However, the proposed caregiver tax credit was ultimately left out of Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending legislation signed in July 2025, while bipartisan legislation that would provide eligible working caregivers with a tax credit of up to $5,000, has gone no where in Congress. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 20:55
"Doomsday": U.S. Military Planning To Survive 90 Days Without Power Grid The Department of Defense is preparing for a potential "doomsday" scenario in which America's power grid collapses, supply chains grind to a halt, and military installations are forced to operate for three months without outside support, according to Fox News. The unprecetended plan, branded FORTRESS by Pentagon planners, aims to make major military bases across the continental United States capable of functioning independently for at least 90 days, according to documents obtained by the news outlet. U.S. Air Force airmen and civilian contractors prepare a containerized nuclear power reactor for airlift aboard a C-17 Globemaster III at March Air Reserve Base, California, Feb. 13, 2026. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Monique Bright) "We don't want to rely on standard civilian municipal infrastructure to run our national defense. We just simply can't. It's an intolerable risk," DoD spokesperson Sean Parnell said. The Pentagon is exploring portable nuclear reactors, massive battery installations, and independent microgrids that would allow bases to disconnect from civilian power systems during prolonged blackouts. Officials have long feared that the lose of electricity could cripple communications, logistics, weapons production, and military command structures. FORTRESS also reportedly calls for stockpiling ammunition, fuel, critical minerals, electronics, spare parts, and medical supplies, while preparing civilian factories to rapidly transition into wartime production. The Pentagon also plans recurring industrial stress tests and mobilization exercises, alongside measures to protect military communications and navigation systems from satellite disruptions and GPS jamming. "I realized that a lot of the way we think about homeland defense was built around the antiquated assumption that two oceans would protect us," Parnell said. "President Trump understands that world is gone, and he's already paved the way for new thinking: Golden Dome, a renewed focus on the Western Hemisphere, Greenland, Panama." "The next conflict will likely be fought on multiple fronts. Look at the geopolitics behind any major war. When that happens, global supply chains will break," the official added. "You don't want to be making these decisions in the middle of a global multi-front conflict. We have to have a plan." The ongoing threats to America's power grid come from both foreign adversaries and domestic saboteurs. In February 2024, the NSA and other federal agencies warned that Chinese state-sponsored hackers linked to Volt Typhoon had compromised critical U.S. infrastructure networks, including energy, water, transportation, and communications systems. In December 2022, gunmen attacked two electrical substations in North Carolina, plunging roughly 45,000 customers into darkness and leaving some without power for five days. * * * Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 20:30
Netanyahu Says Iran May Try To Disrupt Israeli Election With Attacks Authored by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that Iran and its allies might try to disrupt Tuesday's elections in Israel with attacks, warning Tehran that Jerusalem would respond with overwhelming counterstrikes. "We have intelligence signs that our enemies, Iran and its proxies, could challenge us with attacks in order to disrupt the elections," Netanyahu said in a video released by his office on Sunday. "Don't test us. You will suffer disproportionate blows," he said, adding that the Israeli military was postured for defensive and offensive operations. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei said on Monday it "makes no difference" who wins the Israeli election. At a press briefing in Tehran, he was asked about reports in Israeli media that Iran might launch a preemptive military strike to disrupt the vote. "I do not think there are elections there in the true sense of the word," Baghaei said, according to Iranian state-run media IRNA. "It is a race among individuals, each trying to prove that they can commit more crimes, aggression, and killings than the others." Baghaei's remarks came as Tehran prepared to host senior officials from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey - the three signatories of the Mecca Joint Defense Agreement - to discuss regional security and de-escalation of the conflict between Iran on one side and the United States and Israel on the other. Netanyahu's warning came as Israelis on Monday entered the final 24 hours of an intense election season, as reports circulated that Netanyahu may have tried to pressure Israeli military leaders into initiating a possible escalation with Iran on the eve of the vote. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz denied the reports. "The reports about gaps between the political echelon and the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] on the Iran issue are entirely baseless and false," Katz said in a Monday post on X. "I state unequivocally that there was no intention on Israel's part to initiate an attack on Iran before the elections in Israel - when we made clear that if Iran attacks Israel, we will respond with great force." He also accused opposition figures of exploiting these reports for political gain. Israel's opposition candidates seized on the reports to criticize Netanyahu, accusing him of putting regional stability at risk in order to boost his chances at the ballot. Netanyahu's main rival, former military chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot, took to social media to criticize him for putting his "political interests above the state's security." "We will not allow you to endanger Israel's future in order to preserve your rule," he wrote. Avigdor Lieberman, head of the Yisrael Beiteinu party, said he sent a letter to Israel's attorney general demanding a criminal investigation into Netanyahu on charges of treason. "The attempt to drag the State of Israel into war on the eve of elections, together with the willingness to sacrifice IDF soldiers solely due to fear of losing the elections, constitutes treason against the state, its security, and the IDF soldiers," Lieberman wrote in a post on X. Trump Endorses Netanyahu U.S. President Donald Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Monday that a vote for Netanyahu would "finish the job" of stopping Iran from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon. Describing Netanyahu as an "outstanding Warrior Prime Minister," Trump wrote, "There can no longer be the chant heard around the World of 'Death to America, Death to Israel,' and there won't be." As Israeli voters head to the polls on Tuesday, Netanyahu's party is neck and neck with Eisenkot, his strongest rival, in a campaign that has largely revolved around security. Calling Trump a "true friend" of Israel, Eisenkot said on social media that he appreciates the U.S. president's actions and commitment to Israel's security. At the same time, he downplayed Trump's endorsement of Netanyahu, saying that he is convinced Trump would work "in full cooperation with any leader" chosen by Israelis. Meanwhile, senior Israeli security officials told Epoch Magazine Israel that any potential future Israeli military action against Iran could include the assassination of senior regime figures, most notably current Iranian leader Mojtaba Khamenei and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander General Ahmad Vahidi. The officials said credible intelligence indicates that Khamenei remains involved in the regime's most critical decisions. They added, however, that targeting Iran's top leadership would not in itself be enough to bring the regime down, and that further measures, particularly strikes against Iran's energy facilities and nuclear sites, would be necessary. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 20:05
Can Undersea Volcanoes Power Cities? A Seattle Startup Just Took The First Step Authored by Haley Zaremba via OilPrice, A geothermal startup aiming to source energy directly from undersea volcanoes just hit a major milestone that could bring round-the-clock clean energy to cities on the northwest coast of the United States and serve as a critical proof of concept for other regions, with particular relevance for the other 14 countries situated along the Pacific Ring of Fire. Seattle-based energy startup Endurance Energy just announced that it successfully created net-positive energy from its underwater geothermal plant in a world first. The company successfully demonstrated a full operations cycle from drilling to electricity generation in a major breakthrough for next-gen clean energy tech. Although the demonstration created less than 10 seconds of positive energy production, the implications of those ten seconds are hard to overstate. "On Sept. 27, we put a power plant on an active underwater volcano and made power," said Andrew Redd, founder and CEO of Endurance Energy. "This historic milestone is also our first end-to-end test. We now know, firsthand, what works at depth, what needs to be improved, and how to build the next system for sustained commercial generation." Not only does the brief achievement serve as a critical proof of concept for the technology, the project also "showed that operators in Seattle could control the system from an offshore location, remotely starting and stopping the equipment, monitoring temperatures and pressures, and collecting data without being underwater," according to a recent report from Interesting Engineering. Putting a geothermal plant on the seafloor presents some key benefits as compared to traditional models, but also yields critical trade-offs. The cool water of the seafloor acts as a natural cooling system, and the pressure of the water acts as a natural pressurizer that allows for the plants to be designed compactly, according to Redd. The company's next milestone, building a larger 2-megawatt commercial generator in the Pacific island nation of Tonga, will be a test of these more productive, but still compact, generator systems. "The 2 MW commercial generators will be about the size of a shipping container, and we are deploying up to six of these generators [to] offshore Tonga," Redd told Ars Technica. "The physical footprint of this project will be relatively small." However, building a geothermal plant underwater presents extra challenges that could incur prohibitively high upfront costs as compared to on-land models. "It's probably technically feasible, but it would undoubtedly be more expensive than to do it on land," Roland Horne, professor of energy science & engineering at Stanford University, recently told Ars Technica. Underwater geothermal is just one of many next-gen geothermal technologies being developed and tested today, as the urgency of shoring up new, clean, and indigenous forms of energy production becomes an ever-more urgent imperative against the backdrop of the artificial intelligence boom. Big Tech companies are bullish about investing in enhanced geothermal energy as part of their clean energy portfolios, while the Trump administration has also thrown its weight behind the sector's development. Indeed, one of the biggest benefits of geothermal energy is that it is one of the vanishingly few clean energy technologies that enjoy broad bipartisan support. By borrowing drilling techniques from the oil and gas industry, the United States could position itself as a global leader in advanced geothermal energy in coming years, a goal which aligns itself with the decarbonization priorities of the left and the energy dominance aims of the right. "The U.S. has a number of different superpowers, and putting holes in the ground and taking things out of those holes is one of them - and doing so more economically and more efficiently than basically any other place on Earth," Drew Nelson, vice president of Project InnerSpace, was quoted by Cipher News. Accordingly, the Department of Energy has high hopes for the emerging technology, estimating that enhanced geothermal projects could provide an impressive 90 gigawatts of clean energy in the United States by 2050, or about enough to power at least 65 million homes. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 19:15
"Democracy Has Failed": Bolsonaro Says Lula's Socialist Regime Seized His Passport Summary: Bolsonaro Says Lula's Socialist Regime Seized His Passport Ibovespa Stock Index Plunges 20%, Triggers Circuit Breaker Real Crashes 11% To 5.58/USD Brazil Markets Crater After Socialist Lula's Shock Victory; Bolsonaro Seeks To Annul Runoff Bolsonaro Says Lula's Socialist Regime Seized His Passport Beyond the turmoil in Brazilian markets that crushed the Ibovespa stock index and the local currency, the real, new political developments emerged late Monday afternoon. Flávio Bolsonaro said the unhinged socialist regime under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva had seized his passport and banned him from leaving the country on the orders of regime favorite Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes. "I went to visit my father... As I was leaving, Lula's Federal Police were at his front door, and right there in the middle of the street," Bolsonaro said in a video posted on X. He added, "This is a sign that our democracy has failed..." Flávio Bolsonaro says he was ordered to hand over his passports after 'losing' the runoff election in Brazil. Bolsonaro says he went to visit his imprisoned father, who is the former president of Brazil, and was confronted by "Lula's Federal Police." "I went to visit my father... As I was leaving, Lula’s Federal Police were at his front door, and right there in the middle of the street." "I was served an order to surrender my passports; I am also prohibited from leaving the country..." "This is a sign that our democracy has failed..." "I will surrender my passports and defend myself against this travesty, which is a clear attempt to intimidate me. But no one will silence me..." Bolsonaro is calling for the election to be annulled following a last-minute voting extension made by Lula's former personal attorney. The New York Times reports that confusion over Justice Cristiano Zanin's last-minute voting extension could lead to the election being annulled. When Zanin made the last-minute decision to extend voting hours, some polling stations had already closed and shut down their voting machines. They could not reopen. "Fernando Neisser, an electoral law professor at Fundação Getulio Vargas, a Brazilian research institute, said the election could be annulled if the margin is very narrow and it is shown that polling stations stayed open longer in areas that strongly favor one candidate," the NYT reported. — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 26, 2026 Lula, who pulled off a miracle runoff election win overnight after a controversial last-minute, two-hour voting extension, was called out by President Trump late in the afternoon: "It looked terrible...it looked like another RIGGED ELECTION!" ? BREAKING: President Trump declares the Brazil presidential election stolen from Flavio Bolsonaro looked RIGGED "It looked terrible...it looked like another RIGGED ELECTION!" "I didn't take sides, but it was a terrible look for a world. It's another election — elections HAVE to be indisputable. It looked very BAD to me!" "It looked SO CORRUPT." ? Lula's hand-picked justice extended the voting hours and it JUST SO HAPPENED to benefit his jurisdictions. This is the same playbook used by other leftist governments in Latin America like VZ and Cuba! THROW OUT THE RESULT. — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 26, 2026 Lula's socialist regime appears to have the support of far-left Alex Soros, who has made a career of funding globalist NGOs that are destroying the West. Lula Lula Lula! Congrats to Brazil for standing up against authoritarianism once again! ?? ⚖️✌️ — Alex Soros (@AlexanderSoros) October 26, 2026 Also, DSA and Democrats have been cheerful today about Lula's questionable win. DSA was in Brazil Well well well — Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) October 26, 2026 This is who DSA supports. ???? Após o resultado das eleições, apoiadores de Lula queimaram uma bandeira dos Estados Unidos. https://t.co/HhjKkTJuN7 — Vista Pátria (@vista_patria) October 26, 2026 What a glimpse into Brazil's future: four more years of a socialist hellhole, fully supported by DSA. Market Shock Brazilian assets crashed after President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's surprise runoff victory over Flávio Bolsonaro unraveled bullish bets across local stocks and the real. A controversial last-minute, two-hour voting extension has prompted Bolsonaro to call for the runoff to be annulled. Math doesn’t add up — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 26, 2026 Amazing the NYT is willing to admit this in print. The Brazil results are not legitimate and should be annulled after the TSE voted not to extend but Lula's lawyer who sits on the court extended them anyway. The election was a scam played out for everyone to see. https://t.co/ASzIDf5FjB — Jim Pfaff (@jimpfaff) October 26, 2026 "Needless to say, the outcome caught most of the market by surprise, with President Lula completing a major turnaround and winning the runoff," UBS analyst Daniel Pompiani told clients earlier this morning. The real plunged as much as 11% this morning, while longer-dated interest-rate swap contracts surged almost 300 basis points after hitting trading limits. Exchange operator B3 widened trading limits for currency, interest-rate, and stock futures for Monday's regular session to accommodate the volatility. Brazilian stocks last triggered a circuit breaker during the COVID crash in early 2020. Ibovespa stock-index futures plunged 20%, prompting warnings from trading desks and triggering a circuit-breaker halt. Traders had positioned for a Bolsonaro victory after his first-round lead sparked a rally and attracted billions in foreign inflows. After Lula's victory, JPMorgan analysts downgraded their outlook on Brazil's currency and rates from overweight to market-weight. "The post-election message of the market is clear: There is no vacation time for the next four years, and the country will need to address the fiscal issue," said Peter Varga, a senior portfolio manager at Erste Asset Management. UBS' Pompiani asked: Will the BCB intervene? It is very likely, but probably not right at the open. The BCB usually monitors flows and overall market conditions before stepping in, as its focus tends to be on market dysfunction rather than defending a specific level. The first move should be violent, but price discovery will be difficult. With liquidity thin and positioning caught offside, headline levels may matter less than where the market can actually clear risk. Société Générale analyst Brendan McKenna told clients, "Don't call it a comeback, Lula's been here for years." McKenna provided clients with five key points: 1. Lula's victory in the runoff of Brazil's presidential election marks an abrupt end to Latin America's conservative wave and a shift away from the right side of the political spectrum. What began as anti-incumbent sentiment driven by rising crime, corruption, and inflation ultimately culminated in strong support for Lula and his policy platform. While most Latin American countries will continue to be governed by conservative administrations, the region's two largest economies, Brazil and Mexico, will be led by left-leaning governments. The Latin America election calendar is lighter in 2027 highlighted by general elections in Argentina toward the end of next year. We cannot help but wonder if Brazil pushing back on the right is an indication for a return to Peronism in Argentina or the start of the broader Latam pendulum swinging back left 2. Regardless of whether Brazil's election marks an inflection point in regional politics, financial market contagion from Lula's re-election across Latin America should be limited. Brazil's financial markets are likely to come under significant pressure at the open; however, with most Latin American elections already behind us and many countries having secured more market-friendly policy platforms, we believe any Lula-induced selloff is likely to remain largely idiosyncratic to Brazil rather than trigger region-wide contagion. Argentina may be more vulnerable to spillover effects as regional markets have already demonstrated unease regarding President Milei potentially not being re-elected in 2027. Brazil rejecting a platform similar in style to President Milei could prompt more concern across Argentine local markets, but the extent of any spillover from Brazil's election should be contained to Buenos Aires. 3. Fiscal discipline is likely to prove more elusive under another Lula administration, and we see little reason to expect a meaningful fiscal adjustment during a fourth Lula term. That said, Lula will face a right-leaning Congress that could constrain his ability to further loosen fiscal policy. A bond market and currency that remain under pressure could also force the government to adopt a more pragmatic fiscal stance to reassure investors, similar to Lula's efforts to pursue spending restraint after market pressures intensified in late 2024. Should Vice President Alckmin assume a more prominent role in Economy Ministry, and if Finance Minister Durigan continues to emphasize fiscal responsibility, financial markets may stabilize relatively quickly. However, achieving a peak in government debt ratios is likely to remain challenging. 4. Brazil's Local market selling is likely to be severe, but we will primarily be looking for opportunities to buy BRL. A Lula victory is likely to embed a political risk premium in the currency; however, BRL's underlying fundamentals remain strong. The real continues to benefit from elevated real interest rate differentials, a manageable current account position, and a central bank with adequate foreign exchange reserves and a demonstrated willingness to deploy them to support financial market and FX stability. In addition, BRL may benefit from the presence of a conservative-leaning Congress that could constrain any efforts by President Lula to further loosen fiscal policy. Should Vice President Alckmin be appointed economy minister and Finance Minister Durigan remain in his role, markets may also take comfort in the continuity and elevated prominence of a technocratic economic team. Our range to watch is BRL5.70-BRL5.75. We would view USDBRL in that range as more interesting to engage in tactical trades to express potentially oversold conditions. 5. Rates may be a little trickier, as the upcoming BRL selloff is likely to push near-term inflation expectations higher, on top of an IPCA trajectory that was already expected to firm through the end of this year and into early 2027. SG Economics now forecasts a slower and shallower Brazilian Central Bank (BCB) easing cycle, which could keep the Selic rate above current market expectations through the end of 2028. As a result, the popular pre-runoff receiver trade may face headwinds for a more extended period, particularly relative to FX markets. Rates pressure should be felt across the curve, but the longer end of the curve should feel pressured most acutely given renewed fiscal concerns associated with the Lula administration. For now, our focus remains on identifying attractive BRL entry points rather than expressing bullish views through rates markets. Brazil Markets Crater After Socialist Lula's Shock Victory; Bolsonaro Seeks To Annul Runoff Brazilian Senator Flávio Bolsonaro said overnight that he would seek to annul the presidential runoff, challenging a last-minute, two-hour voting extension granted at the request of socialist President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's campaign. The order came from Supreme Court Justice Cristiano Zanin, Lula's former personal attorney, whom the president appointed to the high court. Lula later won the runoff after Bolsonaro finished first in the first round earlier this month, setting the stage for a legal challenge to the court's questionable intervention. BREAKING: Flávio Bolsonaro: It is impossible to recognize the election results in the context of how these things happened. We are going to use our legal team, we are going to request the annulment of these elections. https://t.co/PVtKvb9b3M — Clash Report (@clashreport) October 26, 2026 According to the electoral court, Lula was re-elected for a record fourth term on Sunday, taking 51.76% of the vote to Bolsonaro's 48.24% in a surprise outcome. Via Bloomberg: Bolsonaro said, "It is impossible to recognize the election outcome given the circumstances in which all of this took place," adding, "We will pursue legal action and seek to have the election annulled." @zerohedge @jeffreytucker Pretty weird … — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 26, 2026 Trump: JUST IN: Trump threatens to tariff Brazil unless they redo their election — Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) October 26, 2026 Greta received her talking points: ???? Greta has a take on the Brazilian election: Lula = good for the planet Anyone else = literal apocalypse LMAO ??? Writer: Samuel https://t.co/5jNhSlYxSM — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) October 25, 2026 The questionable voting-extension ruling came minutes after polling stations nationwide were scheduled to close at 5 p.m. local time. Zanin later clarified that it applied only to polling stations that remained open. Soros Jr happy https://t.co/RGCWgVyZ5s — zerohedge (@zerohedge) October 26, 2026 UBS analyst Justin Wensek told clients, "Flavio's annulment request is unlikely to hold water given his campaign also asked for additional time in specific states that were impacted by adverse weather." The focus now shifts to Brazilian markets, where the "Bolsonaro trade" has reversed and shares of companies across the banking, steel and metals, and oil and gas sectors have plunged: BANKS, FINANCIAL FIRMS US-listed shares in lenders fall: Banco Bradesco -27%, Itau Unibanco Holding -28%, NU Holdings -22%, Inter & Co. -32%, Banco Santander (Brasil) -11% Among other financial firms: PagSeguro Digital -28%, StoneCo -31%, PicS -27% STEEL, METAL & MINING Among movers: Companhia Siderurgica Nacional -13%, Vale -7.7%, Gerdau S.A. -14% AERO, OIL & GAS AND OTHER SECTORS Among other movers: XP Inc. -39%, Ambev -19%, Embraer -2.6%, MercadoLibre -2.6%, Telefonica Brasil -16%, Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais -15%, Companhia Paranaense de Energia -17%, Petroleo Brasileiro -19%, Ultrapar Participacoes -18%, Cia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo (SABESP) -22%, TIM S.A. -17% iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) cratered 27% in premarket trading on the surprise Lula win. UBS analyst Wensek added more color on the significant repricing of Brazilian assets as the market readjusts to four more years of socialist Lula: Brazil's fiscal outlook again takes center stage, as debt/GDP trajectory resumes its ominous path. The desk expects a significant re-pricing of Brazilian assets on Monday, as the market adjusts to another four years of Lula, with USDBRL potentially at 5.3 Monday. Note that FX didn't react that much in the first round; it was more about rates and equities. EM strategist Roque Montero thinks USDBRL could drift to 5.5-5.6 by end-2026 given December negative seasonality. In rates, Roque expects a 100-150bp move higher. Equities could correct by 10-15% based on latest EWZ reaction. Among stocks, watch for selling pressure/rotation out of SOEs, high beta and rate sensitive names, into defensive, USD leveraged, cash flow generative names. If there is a silver lining, Lula will have to build a coalition to pass key policy initiatives through a more right-leaning Senate and Lower House. Beyond Bolsonaro's possible court battle to challenge the results, Brazil now faces a financial reckoning as public debt has climbed to 83% of GDP from 71.7% when Lula and the socialists took office in January 2023, leaving traders to digest the continued fiscal deterioration. ING analysts see a 5%-7% slide in real terms and double-digit stock losses today. The repricing is already underway offshore: Brazil's dollar bonds were among the worst performers in emerging markets, with yields on notes due in 2037 jumping 19 basis points to 6.44%. What Goldman analysts expect from here: Rates and equities will see the most damage. In rates, where we settle will depend on damage control on fiscal. There are people close to the president advocating for fiscal consolidation given its impact on financing cost. Market will closely monitor Finance Minister announcement, and the details of fiscal consolidation. Adjustments involving Constitutional spending cap/ fiscal target would be well received, and trim on specific social programs without longer term commitment likely won't calm market. If we see credible fiscal reform, BCB can continue its easing path given the still-very-high real rate, so front-end-to-belly receiver could be attractive again after the correction. Equity market will likely price out optimism around structural reforms to improve SOE/ business environment. USDBRL – expect to settle in new range of 5.4-5.8. This will limit BCB's ability to accelerate its pace of easing. Brown Brothers Harriman's Elias Haddad sees a buying opportunity emerging from the selloff. * * * Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 18:53
Iran Braces For Nightmare Energy Crisis As Deepening Political Chaos Threatens To Boil Over Iran is facing a potentially crippling energy crisis as winter approaches, adding to mounting economic woes and political infighting that threaten to further destabilize the Islamic Republic. Photo: Reuters Iranian First Vice President Mohammadreza Aref warned on Monday that the government may be forced to restrict natural gas supplies to major consumers as temperatures plunge, according to the London-based and Saudi-funded Iran International. "We must maintain the stability of the gas network during the cold months so that cold and remote regions can be supplied," Aref reportedly said. The warning comes on the heels of Iranian lawmaker Hosseinali Haji Deligani demanding over the weekend that parliament move forward with impeachment proceedings against the foreign and agriculture ministers, blaming the senior officials for soaring food prices. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has also faced criticism from hardliners over his approach to negotiations with the United States, Iran International reports. The calls to oust senior officials are the latest sign of deepening divisions within the upper echelons of Iran's government over how to end the war with the U.S. Amid the growing political turmoil, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has appeared to add another condition to Tehran's demands for returning to the negotiating table with Washington, insisting that some U.S. sanctions must be lifted before direct talks can resume. Pezeshkian claimed that escalating American economic pressure was undermining prospects for diplomacy, demanding concrete sanctions relief before negotiations could move forward. "Threats and sanctions must be removed in practice to pave the way for dialogue. We cannot increase the intensity of sanctions and pressure every day, close the avenues of interaction, and at the same time talk about negotiations," he wrote on X. باید تهدیدها و تحریمها در عمل برطرف شود، تا زمینه گفتوگو فراهم شود. نمیتوان هر روز بر شدت تحریمها و فشارها افزود، راههای تعامل را بست و همزمان از مذاکره سخن گفت. گفتوگو با زبان تهدید و فشار معنا ندارد. — Masoud Pezeshkian (@drpezeshkian) October 21, 2026 As ZeroHedge previously mused, Pezeshkian may be hoping for a diplomatic breakthrough similar to recent developments between Washington and Moscow, where Trump has eased certain economic pressures while pursuing direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. However, Iran's economy remains under severe strain, with a plunging rial and soaring inflation squeezing ordinary citizens. While Iranian leaders insist the country can withstand years of economic hardship, U.S. military officials paint a far bleaker picture. Earlier this month, U.S. Central Command chief Adm. Brad Cooper claimed that Iran's financial troubles have become so severe that Tehran-backed militias are withholding soldiers' pay to funnel money to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which he said is also struggling to pay its troops. Reports of deepening divisions within Iran's leadership come as CNN reported earlier Monday that the Trump administration is weighing plans for another round of military strikes against Tehran after the midterm elections. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks during the 81st United Nations General Assembly at the UN Headquarters in New York, on Wednesday, September 23. Timothy A. Clary/AFP/Getty Images Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 18:50
Somaliland Accuses Ilhan Omar Of Leaking Classified Congressional Info To Somalia Authored by Catherine Salgado via PJ Media, Another day, another Omar scandal, another piece of evidence indicating foreign loyalties and domestic betrayal. AP Photo/Jim Mone Rep. Ilhan Omar's (D-Minn.) father participated in genocide in Somaliland, and Omar herself has connections to top Somali thugs, so unsurprisingly there is a natural antipathy between Omar and Somaliland. The latest (resurrected) accusation from the breakaway African republic against Omar is that she leaked classified information to Somali leaders. Ali Hassan Mohamed, former Somaliland minister of information, originally posted his accusation against Omar in 2024, but the @RepOfSomaliland account, which Somaliland's Foreign Ministry has said is not an official government channel, is highlighting the accusation again to emphasize why Omar is a threat to American security. This is not the first time that Ilhan Omar created animosity between Somalis. She was heavily involved in the conflict that took place in Las-anod. In December 2022, she visited Garowe, where she leaked information to some of the Somali leaders pertaining a meeting between the President of Somaliland and the Foreign Affairs Committee of the US Congress, which she was a member by that time. She was very persistent and urged the Somalian leaders to take proactive actions against Somaliland as soon as possible. A month after this, the Las-anod conflict broke out. She was certainly one of the main characters who created hatred and division among Somalis. So it is time for Ilhan to be held accountable for her wrongdoings. — Ali Hassan Mohamed (@AliHassanMoham) January 29, 2024 On Sunday, the @RepOfSomaliland account (which Somaliland's Foreign Ministry has said is not an official government channel), wrote of Omar, "She served on that same [House Foreign Affairs] committee and pressed Somalian leaders to act against Somaliland before relations between the Republic of Somaliland and the United States grows stronger. Months later on 6 February 2023, the Las Anod conflict erupted. Hundreds were killed and thousands displaced in a move that sought to destabilize Somaliland - but failed. This is how a foreign agent operates." Omar, whose real last name is Nur Said Elmi like her murderous father, is in America just to exploit our systems for her own benefit while still helping out the Islamic dictators back home. Somaliland is pro-America, but Somalia definitely isn't. By the way, the U.S. federal investigation into Omar's immigration fraud includes not only the evidence that she married her brother, but also the total lack of record for her father's naturalization as a citizen. Omar asserted that she had become a United States citizen through her father while she was still a minor, although she likely tampered with her birth year and he apparently lied about his citizenship status. Given all this, it is entirely possible that we have had a noncitizen Somali warlord's daughter sitting in Congress all these years. No wonder she said that she would represent Somalia's interests in Congress. Omar is not just a liar and a criminal; she is a foreign asset embedded in our government. It's time she is out of Congress and deported back to the country she claims to love so much. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 18:45
Blanche Snaps At Dana Bash Over Alaska "January 6" Question As DOJ Defends Suit To Block Certification Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN's Dana Bash on Sunday to "stop it" when she asked whether the Justice Department's Alaska Senate lawsuit is groundwork for overturning an election - insisting "We're not laying any 'groundwork' for the president to do that, so your premise, your question, is not true!" he said. Dana Bash asked Attorney General Todd Blanche if DOJ's Alaska lawsuit is groundwork for President Trump to "overturn the election," with a January 6th callback for good measure. Blanche: "You got to stop it with that. You are not being a real person." "We're not laying any... pic.twitter.com/TRYGOK05Lr — Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) October 25, 2026 Bash, on State of the Union, referred to a "doomsday scenario" that Blanche had described days earlier, and asked whether Trump was positioning himself to overturn a result he did not like. "Oh, stop it," Blanche answered. "You are not being a real person. Come on, man." Bash replied, "Why are you yelling at me?" and said she "would have said that 'before Jan. 6.'" Blanche called the question "crazy," and then "not a real question." The suit at the center of it was filed on Thursday, Oct. 22, against the state of Alaska. It asks a federal court to bar Alaska from certifying its Senate result in certain circumstances while the Justice Department investigates whether voters were confused by a second "Dan Sullivan" on the ballot. Incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan faces former Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola. Daniel J. Sullivan, a former teacher with the same name, CBS News reports, announced his candidacy in June. The Justice Department's own framing is narrower than the headlines. Blanche said the filing "does not seek to stop any ballot from being cast or to stop the certification of Alaska's election," the Daily Caller reports. On Face the Nation the same morning he told CBS's Margaret Brennan the suit was not "saying, 'don't certify,'" and that the state should not certify only if a court found the race was decided "because of confusion, and not the will of the voters." He called it "the Department of Justice doing our own research under the law," and said the aim was to "put guardrails in place" so ballots could be preserved to determine whether there was confusion. The Department of Justice does not seek to stop any ballot from being cast or to stop the certification of Alaska's election. This litigation seeks to ensure that after Alaskans cast their ballots, they are preserved in a manner so that only Alaska's governing officials have the... — Attorney General Todd Blanche (@AGToddBlanche) October 24, 2026 The Alaska courts have already looked at the name overlap, and ruled against removing him. An election official found Daniel J. Sullivan ineligible, citing a "determined effort and a deliberate attempt" to confuse voters, CBS reports. He appealed, and the state Supreme Court affirmed that he could appear on the ballot. Blanche said the administration had hoped the court "would actually issue an opinion and explain their reasoning." Blanche also conceded the outcome is open. "We don't know what's going to happen yet," he said. Asked about Trump's remark that "I'm the one that said, 'do it,'" he said he had "no idea" to whom the president was referring. The suit has opponents on the right. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said, "The Department of Justice should never have filed this lawsuit." Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said it was appropriate "to take a look at" the situation, but added: "I do mind the appearance of filing a lawsuit before we even know if the facts..." The Peltola campaign called the suit "a despicable political threat to overturn an election." The ACLU has challenged it, arguing the federal government lacks authority over certification under the National Voter Registration Act, the Daily Caller reports. The filing came 11 days before Election Day, Blanche said. As ZeroHedge reported when Trump first floated "powerful legal options" against the other Sullivan, the second candidate took only 2.5% of the primary vote. Alaska uses ranked-choice voting, and the suit's trigger is a result in which the incumbent loses but would have won had every vote for the other Sullivan gone to him. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 18:25
Trump Fires Another Salvo Into Israeli Politics As Netanyahu Neck-and-Neck With Gadi Eisenkot President Trump's public endorsement of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the upcoming elections in Israel was already unprecedented for a sitting American President when he first issued it on Oct.18. And so it is raising eyebrows that Trump has issued yet another full-throated statement endorsing him, just within 48 hours of the high stakes vote in Israel. Sunday night saw Trump put out a second statement, saying that the US and Israel need to "finish the job" against Iran. It comes amid reports Washington and Tel Aviv have been planning a round three major bombing campaign. via Flash90 "To the people of Israel, to those who haven’t seen it, I am attaching the Endorsement I gave one week ago to your Prime Minister, Bibi Netanyahu. As everyone is aware, including the enemy, Bibi and I have had a great relationship in winning together," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post which actually borrows heavily from the original endorsement post. "I did the Venezuelan attack, one of the most successful military operations in history but, before that, we did Operation Midnight Hammer, stopping the world’s number one state sponsor of terror from obtaining a nuclear weapon." "When you go to the Polls please remember that Bibi has been an outstanding Warrior Prime Minister! Israel was called The Little Satan, with the United States being called The Big Satan, by some very evil people. There can no longer be the chant heard around the World of ‘Death to America, Death to Israel,’ and there won’t be. Vote for Bibi Netanyahu for Prime Minister, we have to finish the job that we started," Trump added. Axios is reporting that an embattled Netanyahu essentially begged his ally in Washington to do more to keep him in office: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — fighting for political survival in Tuesday's elections — has pleaded with President Trump in recent days to show more public support for his campaign, according to a U.S. source with knowledge and an Israeli source briefed on the matter. The U.S. source said the White House sees Netanyahu's aggressive lobbying as a "sign of desperation" and an indication that the Israeli leader thinks he's trailing. Indeed polls show Netanyahu's Likud is trailing main rival, Gadi Eisenkot and his Yashar party. Palestinians are about to realize that Netanyahu was the moderate. — Ipwnkyle (@ipwnkyle) October 25, 2026 But neither of the two major blocs is believed yet to be able to take enough seats to secure a majority in the 120-seat Knesset. Rather than face defeat, there's growing speculation that Netanyahu could launch a new Iran attack before tomorrow's vote as a big distraction - given also the historical pattern of Netanyahu engaging in wars while staying in power. On Sunday Netanyahu posted an AI-generated image depicting a nuclear explosion in Tel Aviv. He claimed that anyone else taking power would subject Israelis to the danger of a "second Holocaust." New Netanyahu post: https://t.co/rkxcCaQjeS — NewsWire (@NewsWire_US) October 25, 2026 Netanyahu also warned that that future generations "will not forgive us if we miss this historic window of opportunity" - and that Iran must be dealt with while Trump is still in office. As a reminder, 77-year old "Bibi" has led Israel for nearly 19 of the past 30 years, and he's constantly emphasized security, in many ways becoming a kind of permanent wartime prime minister. He's overseen the decimation of Gaza in the wake of the Oct.7 attack, and wars in Lebanon, Syria, and occasional strikes on Yemen. The Iran war remains the biggest conflict he's overseen, which has seen ballistic missiles and drones rain down on Israeli cities and bases as part of previous Iranian retaliation waves. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 17:40
'Prison For Reich': Musk Slams Former Labor Secretary Over Commie Fever Dream To Nationalize SpaceX Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich said on a podcast that Democrats should lay the groundwork for nationalizing SpaceX and Starlink if they win the White House, according to PJ Media. "Defund Musk. I mean this," Reich told host Heather Lofthouse on The Coffee Klatch. "If we have a Democratic administration - and the Democrats ought to be starting this, not just with oversight hearings, but also laying the groundwork for nationalizing Starlink and SpaceX. Nationalize it." NEW: Robert Reich calls for the "defunding" of Elon Musk, calls for Democrats to go after Musk's companies. "Democrats ought to [start] laying the groundwork for nationalizing Starlink & SpaceX... It should be a public corporation." Does he want Musk to drop another $50M on the... pic.twitter.com/0jiljf0CtG — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 25, 2026 His case rests on money and power. "It should be a public corporation," Reich said. "We should not ever have that kind of power in one person's hands, one private person's hands." He claimed that 75% of Musk's wealth depends on taxpayers who are buying Starlink systems for the Department of Defense, a figure none of the coverage checks. The government's side of the ledger is large but smaller than that claim implies. The Benton Institute counted $6.45 billion in SpaceX's biggest Space Force awards this year, $2.29 billion for the Space Data Network and $4.16 billion for an airborne target-tracking satellite network. Those contracts show how much of SpaceX's business is the Pentagon's, but nothing in the coverage shows what share of Musk's wealth they represent. Reich went further than contracts. He called Musk "Exhibit A in terms of the billionaire takeover of America," likened him to "the robber barons of the first Gilded Age" and said Musk "is trying to buy the senator from Texas." When Lofthouse read Musk's recent posts aimed at Democrats, Reich said Musk knows that if Democrats take the House and possibly the Senate, "he's really going to be targeted, and he knows it." That fits what ZH has been tracking. Democrats are reportedly preparing sweeping investigations of Musk's contracts and DOGE role, and NYU's Scott Galloway predicted "the mother of all subpoenas" on Nov. 4, as we reported. Musk had already warned on Oct. 21, "Live by the sword, die by the sword." Musk replied to Reich directly on X. Stealing companies is a serious crime. Prison for Reich. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 25, 2026 Reich has been on the other side of this before. In August 2025 he wrote on Substack that Trump's state capitalism "would be communism under any other dictator." Where he objected to the government taking stakes in private companies under Trump, he now wants two of them in public hands under a Democrat. The remarks came in a podcast answer, not a policy proposal. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 17:20
Rubio Urges Cubans To Partner With CIA To Bring Change To Communist Country Authored by Owen Evans via The Epoch Times, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio made a direct appeal to Cubans on Friday, encouraging them to partner with the CIA if they want to see change in the communist country. "To those who seek to create positive change in Cuba - now is the time," Rubio said in an Oct. 23 post on X. "The disappointment of failed promises, corruption, and the privileged lives of only a few; seize this opportunity to create the change you desire through a discrete partnership with the CIA." The CIA followed up Rubio's post on the same platform with the same message in Spanish and included instructions on how to contact the agency. It urged Cubans to use non-personal devices and VPNs. Cuban leader Miguel Diaz-Canel attends a rally in Havana on May 22, 2026. Norlys Perez/Reuters Cuban-born Rep. Carlos A. Gimenez (R-Fla.) said in a post on X that the Cuban regime must be "relegated to the ash heap of history." U.S. President Donald Trump hinted at a new American intervention in Cuba, potentially with military force, as he addressed supporters at a midterm campaign rally in Florida on Oct. 23. He made the comments about Cuba after touting investments in the U.S. military and in military operations this year in Venezuela and Cuba. "The Islamic Republic of Iran will tell you that we have the best equipment," Trump said, before appearing to respond to comments about Cuba from someone in the crowd. "He wants to know 'what about Cuba?' Give me a break. Give me a break. Don't worry. We'll take care of Cuba on our way back from Iran." Cuban Deputy FM Carlos Fernández de Cossío mocked Rubio's direct bid to the island. "Now the U.S. is resorting to public recruitment campaigns for the CIA," he said in an Oct. 23 post on X. "There must be a lot of desperation or a serious lack of resources within the agency if it has to market its offers like toothpaste." Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced earlier this month that state authorities had secured an arrest warrant for former Cuban leader Raúl Castro Ruz. Castro was charged with conspiracy to commit first-degree murder in connection with the 1996 shootdown of two civilian aircraft operated by Brothers to the Rescue over international waters. "The Castro regime's spies operated in our communities, fed intelligence to Havana, and helped put civilian pilots in the crosshairs of Cuban MiGs," Uthmeier said. "Thirty years later, we are still fighting for justice for Carlos Costa, Pablo Morales, Mario de la Peña, and Armando Alejandre Jr." Castro, then minister of the Cuban armed forces and first vice president of Cuba, was a final decision-maker in the chain of command that authorized the shootdown, according to the affidavit. The affidavit stated that Castro gave senior military leaders standing orders that said, "Fine, shoot them down at sea when they show up, and those who have the authority are not to consult anyone." Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez described the arrest warrant against Castro as a "disgraceful act" with no legal, ethical, or practical value, during a press conference on Oct. 21, Spanish news agency EFE reported. Trump issued an executive order in January that said the government of Cuba had "taken extraordinary actions that harm and threaten the United States." It said that the regime aligns itself with, and provides support for, numerous hostile countries and organizations, including Russia, China, Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah. It noted that Cuba hosts Russia's largest overseas signals intelligence facility and also continues to build deep intelligence and defense cooperation with the Chinese communist regime. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 17:00
Senators Say Trump Admin Is Illegally Sitting On Secret Court Ruling About Warrantless Spying Democrat Senators Ron Wyden and Adam Schiff say the Trump administration is illegally withholding a secret surveillance-court ruling that faulted how intelligence analysts search Americans' messages, while pressing Congress to renew the program the ruling covers. The two lawmakers laid out the charge in a demand letter first reported by WIRED. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court issued the opinion on March 17, according to Nextgov. It objected to search filters that let analysts pull Americans' communications out of intercepted data without the approvals, written justifications and records the law requires, WIRED reports, and then approved another year of Section 702 surveillance anyway. The law gives the government 180 days to review a ruling like this for public release. That window closed September 13. The administration's own guidance says the same. The senators want an explanation for the delay, and the names of the officials responsible, by November 6. "If this administration won't follow this simple statutory directive," they wrote to Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton and Attorney General Todd Blanche, "it is unclear why Congress or the American people should trust this administration to follow any of the other legal limits to Section 702." The letter is dated Monday, and Demand Progress and 22 other groups, from the ACLU to a conservative-backed privacy group, urged congressional leaders not to renew the program while the ruling stays buried. It is not the first deadline to pass. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton and Vice Chairman Mark Warner asked the administration in April to release the opinion within 15 days. Demand Progress said in May that the 15 days came and went with nothing declassified. AG Todd Blanche (via AP) Blanche was asked in writing in July whether he would commit to declassifying it by the 180-day mark. His answer, in his written responses, was "Yes." Clayton, who as DNI is legally responsible, has made no such promise. Before his confirmation he said only that the government was "working arduously to expeditiously declassify" the opinion and had given the full text to lawmakers. Warner's office told WIRED he expects Clayton to declassify it, as required by law. Cotton's office did not respond, and the White House, the DNI's office and the Justice Department did not answer WIRED's questions. The opinion is still secret, but pieces of it have leaked. The New York Times reported in April that the court found the tools agencies use to narrow intercepted data to an American's messages amount to searches of Americans, subject to the same limits, and ordered them rebuilt. Nextgov said it could not independently confirm that account. Administration talking points sent to lawmakers said only that the court found the proposed approach "could present deficiencies." Senator Alex Padilla has said the Justice Department is appealing portions of the ruling that limit its use of certain filtering tools. The ruling has a history. A declassified 2025 court opinion described a similar FBI tool that let agents select people in contact with surveillance targets and read their messages. The Justice Department told the court in February 2025 that searches through it had gone uncounted, and the FBI switched it off, then back on later in the year with a rebuilt version. The report also notes that seven intelligence-agency fact sheets issued in March, one dated the day of the ruling, cited a 98.9 percent compliance rate for FBI searches of Americans and never mention the court's findings. The figure does not appear in the Justice Department inspector general's review, which put compliance at 98.6 percent and said it could not conclude the FBI's compliance problems were "entirely in the past." The same fact sheets say FBI auditors review every search of Americans, WIRED reports, while FBI Director Kash Patel closed the bureau's Office of Internal Auditing last May. Lawmakers who have read the ruling say it matters. Senator Dick Durbin told colleagues on the Senate floor in June that once they read it, "your opinion of the role of FISA and the rights of Americans will be impacted for sure." Wyden has said that when a separate classified interpretation of Section 702 is finally declassified, "the American people are going to be stunned that it took so long." The program itself lapsed in June after Congress failed to renew it, though collection continues under the court's March approval, which runs to next March. Trump said earlier that he would not approve FISA without the SAVE America Act going along with it, and intelligence officials are now pressing lawmakers to renew Section 702 by year-end. Reform advocates expect the administration to try to attach a renewal to the annual defense bill, which Congress usually finishes in December, as lawmakers did in 2023. The administration has until November 6 to answer the senators. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 16:45
Iran Signals Rare Flexibility Toward US In Talks With Mecca Pact Representatives Update(1635): Somewhat surprisingly, Iran appears ready to be flexible concerning its conditions and matters of the timeline related to the Hormuz crisis and standoff with US forces: Iran Says It Could Accept Shortening Proposed Seven-Day Deadline if Conditions Are Met In Tehran on Monday, Iran informed delegates from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan that it is willing to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in four to seven days if the US lifts its blockade. State media cited Supreme National Security Council official Ali Bagheri Kani as confirming the flexible timeline, adding that diplomats are now organizing the next round of negotiations. Riyadh is meanwhile stressing de-escalation: The Saudi Foreign Ministry has stressed “the importance of opening channels of negotiation to prevent a return to military escalation” following a meeting of senior officials from the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement states with Iranian officials in Tehran on Monday. Tuesday will witness a big meeting in Moscow: President Vladimir Putin is due to meet Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, in the Russian capital. * * * There are many indicators that the US and Israel could soon attack Iran again, with media consensus in the US pointing to the likelihood of a renewed bombing campaign after the midterm elections. In the interim, regional countries are scrambling for a diplomatic breakthrough, seeking to stave off the next escalation round, given also that past Iranian retaliation has imposed a huge cost on America's Gulf allies. via Associated Press Senior officials from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey in Tehran for high level talks, the deputy secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Ali Bagheri, has confirmed Monday. This includes Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman, Pakistani Army Commander General Asim Munir, and Turkish Intelligence Chief Ibrahim Kalin - who will engage the Iranian side on "regional security". Notably, these three countries are signatories to the Mecca Defense Pact and are also allies of the United States, with Turkey being a NATO member. Iran's Bagheri stated, "The Islamic Republic of Iran's model of defense based on internal and domestic capabilities has become a successful model for building national security." "On the other hand, Iran's strategic policy is to ensure regional security through regional countries and confront any foreign interference and influence, led by the American and Zionist regimes," he added. Bagheri praised the "fruit of the heroic efforts and struggles of the armed forces and the Iranian nation" and expressed hope that Iranian resistance to US-Israeli aims would result in a "region with stability and peace and on the path of progress." Reuters has cited a senior Iranian official who says the meeting was initiated by Pakistan. Jason Brodsky, a hawkish think tank pundit, has reacted to the diplomatic scramble in Tehran: The stories write themselves at this point. I would not be surprised to see a last minute call from regional countries to President Trump pleading for a delay in any military operation against Iran, citing that progress is just around the corner on negotiations or deal that will later fall apart. Over the weekend, just prior to the Mecca Pact countries' delegations going to Tehran, Qatari mediators were also once again in the Iranian capital to "de-escalate regional tensions." Senior officials from Iran, Pakistan, Türkiye and Saudi Arabia have begun a four-way meeting in Tehran, hosted by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei. Participants include Pakistan’s Army Chief Asim Munir, Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman and Turkish Intelligence Chief Ibrahim Kalin. — Clash Report (@clashreport) October 26, 2026 Meanwhile, CNN is reporting that the White House has plans to relaunch major attacks on Iran, and that more American forces are being deployed to the Middle East, so that strikes against Iran could be carried out "within 96 hours of receiving" an order from the president. According to that reporting: Sufficient forces are now deployed in the region to carry out the potential attacks, the sources said. The scope of new US military operations would likely go beyond efforts to simply “mow the lawn” or maintain the status quo by striking radars, launchers and other Iranian assets that can be quickly reconstituted — as has been the case since Trump halted full combat operations earlier this year, the sources added. “It will be a big effort,” one of the officials told CNN. That view has been echoed by other current and former US officials familiar with internal military planning discussions — some of whom say it is a question of when, not if, Trump will issue a go-order. They believe it could come any time before the end of the year, though most likely after the US midterm elections. But it remains the that US administration has yet to define the end goal or 'mission accomplished' moment, now in month eight of what was supposed to be a "two to four-week" conflict. So far, escalation has tended to simply beget more escalation, and not an offramp. It seem they all went to Iran to deliver the final threat. https://t.co/1Akhe5rHHT — Ali (@MerruX) October 26, 2026 A major new bombing campaign would put immensely more pressure on Iran, but would do the same for America's Gulf allies, given they would probably face a huge wave of retaliation from the IRGC in the form of ballistic missiles and drones. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 16:40
Kunstler: "It's All A Giant Mind-F**k" Authored by James Howard Kunstler via Clusterfuck Nation, "We are also starting to consult federal workers on how to do some blocking inside the govt agencies during emergency situations - but please do not put that on the form." - Eric Manton, of the DRG They put it on the form, though, cuz somebody screwed up. Oopsie. . . . Color Revolution Ninja, the Lovely Danielle Reiff Get this: the reason that a color revolution is underway at all in America is not really political anymore - if it ever even was. It's because a whole lot of people have committed crimes against this country. And with each wave of attempted sedition, they have compounded their crimes with more seditious acts, arrant hoaxes, lawfare, election fraud, censorship, and wholesale looting of taxpayer dollars to keep themselves out of prison. That's what USAID was all about, and why it was taken down early in Trump 2.0. It was a nexus of racketeering and the home-base of the Deep State's foot soldiers, bureaucrats who actually managed the money streams to NGOs that ran everything from election rigging operations to vast social services fraud in blue states, in concert with a Democratic Party that had nothing but rackets to keep it going. That's how the USAID's defunct office of Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG) has morphed into the new Democracy Renewal Group (DRG). This new DRG operates under another project called Branch-4 - as in a fourth branch of government, the permanent bureaucracy - and Branch-4 operates under an NGO called the Action Center on Race and the Economy Institute (ACRE Institute), a 501(c)(3) public charity based in Chicago (EIN 82-1199695). Note, the ACRE Institute's primary funders include the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. You see how byzantine this is, echoing exactly the hyper-complex administrative workings of government bureaucracy itself? And so, that's why, for instance, one Eric Manton, a former USAID employee now working with DRG said, ". . . we are also starting to consult federal workers on how to do some blocking inside the govt agencies during emergency situations." Blocking? What they mean by that is federal employees lodged in the official agencies should "help run out the clock. . . develop selective hearing. . . forgetfulness. . . or blame your workload" for whatever it takes to block enforcement of any executive action proposed by the Trump administration. Those tactics are explicitly proposed by another org, the Federal Workers Alliance for Democracy (FWAD formerly known as Federal Workers Against DOGE), which is affiliated with DRG primarily as a partner in the Renew American Democracy (RAD) strategy and through the broader Branch-4 ecosystem. Confused yet? You should be. The flak-storm of acronyms is beloved by Lefty-leftists for exactly that purpose. RAD is run by Danielle Reiff, a 20-year veteran of USAID color revolution programs in Europe and Africa. Her co-coordinator at RAD is one Paul Zeitz, an osteopath and rabbi who worked previously for USAID in Africa and for the State Department as Director of the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development, whatever that was. FWAD is led by one Beverly Schreiber You might ask: why has the FBI not paid a visit to Beverley Schreiber to assess how she is organizing her members to "block" actions that the chief executive orders agencies to carry out? The Federal Workers Alliance for Democracy must have a membership list. If their mission is to block the work of their agencies, as explicitly directed by FWAD, shouldn't they be fired from their jobs? And let's not leave out a few other sketchy orgs and their leaders: Erica Chenoweth, who operates the United Democracy Alliance (UAD) out of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, which likewise operates under the "umbrella" of the Horizon Project, led by Maria J. Stephan and Julia Roig. Stephan was lead foreign affairs officer in the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations (whatever that means), roughly 2009-2014. She was also co-director the Future of Authoritarianism Initiative at the Atlantic Council, which is funded by George Soros's Open Society org. Julia Roig was President and CEO of PartnersGlobal, funded by USAID, the State Dept., the Ford Foundation, and George Soros's Open Society Foundation. What you see is a concoction of intertwined subversive endeavors with more gears and escapements than a Schwarzwald cuckoo clock, all operating under the banner of "Our Democracy," by which they really mean their prerogative to run your world (and punish you for objecting). This includes running a coup against the current chief executive of the USA. Much of this information has been uncovered by the tireless and diligent researcher Jennica Pounds, known as Data Republican on X. She remarked Monday morning: "What makes 2026 different is that it's the first time we know of that we found an operational, short-term plan to actually do a coup." Coincidentally, weird, coup-ish events played out yesterday in the Brazilian election. A judge who had been President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's personal lawyer ordered the polls to stay open an additional two hours until enough votes were "found" to haul Lula across the victory line over his opponent, Flavio Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. Chalk one up for the Globalists. Call it a DoorDash color revolution. Bolsonaro has refused to concede and is officially contesting the election. Expect street demonstrations by Bolsonaro supporters over this caper. Perhaps riots. Maybe Lula getting strung up Mussolini-style. American coupsters will point to that as evidence that Trump supporters will riot after the US midterms. It's all a giant mindfuck. Meanwhile, our coupsters have been outed. We know who they are and what they're up to. And we are all waiting to see what federal law enforcement aims to do about it. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of ZeroHedge. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 16:20
Foreign Demand Craters For Ugly, Tailing 2Y Treasury Auction Ahead Of Fed Decision A week that sees a barrage of macro news, earnings, political developments, capital markets events including the massive Anthropic IPO offering doc and a record equity offering by Meta, also has a flood of coupon issuance to contend with starting with today's $69BN in 2Y paper which sold to tepid demand ahead of this week's FOMC decision. Let's see how the auction did, starting with the high yield 4.708% which was modestly below last month's 4.787% which was the highest since June 2024. This tailed the When Issued 4.705% by 0.3 bps, the biggest tail since March. The bid to cover was 2.589, down from 2.627 last month and the lowest since also March, when it dipped to 2.440. But it was the internals where the biggest surprise, or rather disappointment, was to be found, as foreigners (Indirects) took down just 45.7%, a sharp drop from the 57.8% in September and the lowest since November 2021. Offsetting this collapse in foreign demand was a surge in Direct demand which sent the Direct bid sharply higher from 29.0% to 41.3%, the highest on record... ... leaving 13.0% to Dealers, or roughly in line with recent activity. Overall, this was a surprisingly poor auction, which tailed the 2nd most of 2026, but judging by the dramatic collapse in foreign demand, it is almost surprising the results weren't far worse. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 16:17
Former DOGE Staffers Hacked Into Anthropic's Internal Systems In 12 Hours - And What They Found Is Alarming A months-old cybersecurity startup founded by former DOGE staffers says its AI agents found paths into Anthropic's internal systems in under 12 hours, the Washington Post reported Monday, citing a draft report it reviewed. The company, Cathedral, says it reached meeting transcripts, salary and job-offer details, and Slack messages about Anthropic's most advanced models. The breach was not in Claude itself - the hackers exploited flaws in third-party business software, the kind of administrative and sales tools most companies run. The Post withheld the vendors' names. Photo via GeekWire Cathedral reported the findings to Anthropic earlier this month through Anthropic's bug bounty program, which pays outside researchers to disclose flaws, and told the affected vendors too. Its draft calls the result evidence of "a serious gap between the offensive capabilities now emerging and the defenses," and says its "data accesses were kept to the absolute minimum." A Cathedral spokeswoman declined to comment to the Post. Anthropic says the breach was much narrower - that Cathedral reached "a limited set" of its sales, HR and IT systems, including some customer and partner business contacts and basic user account records, and that it cut off the startup's access the same day. It says Claude users' conversations, source code and model weights were not touched, that its own monitoring flagged some of the activity before Cathedral reported it, and that it has no evidence anyone else exploited the flaws, Gizmodo and Tech Startups report. Anthropic also says the researchers spent several days failing to break into its software directly before turning to the vendors' applications. It accuses Cathedral of breaking the bounty program's rules by not disclosing all of its activity, and of overstating the "implied national security implications." It switched off the affected software until the vendors fixed it and briefed federal officials. A security expert who reviewed the findings at the Post's request said Cathedral "found something big." Alex Stamos, chief information security officer at Cognition, reviewed them. "They found something big here," he said, adding that Anthropic "could have done a lot better" in overseeing outside software vendors. Cognition uses models from Anthropic and other labs. A senior Trump administration official told the Post the report had circulated inside the government and raised national security concerns: "If a bunch of kids who have just started a company can do this, then potentially, the Chinese aren't far behind." Cathedral is no obscure shop. Gizmodo lists its founders as Gavin Kliger, Luke Farritor, Marko Elez and Jack Stein, all DOGE alumni. Kliger was the Pentagon's chief data officer and is reportedly tied to the Pentagon's legal dispute with Anthropic. Reuters reported in July that Cathedral raised $160 million at a $1.4 billion valuation, backed by Andreessen Horowitz and Sequoia, and the senior official told the Post that three federal agencies have recently signed contracts with it. The disclosure lands as Anthropic is courting public investors. On Monday the company dropped its S-1, showing $974 million operating profit against an $800 billion compute bill. The security question for a lab pitching itself as the careful one is now a concrete incident, and the two sides disagree on how big it was. h/t Capital.news $10 OFFYOUR NEXT ORDER.$30 min. Ends Oct 31. One per customer.GET MY $10 OFF →Signs you up for ZeroHedge Store emails. Can't be combined. Every order helps support ZeroHedge. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 16:15
Trump Posts Longest Truth Social Rant Of His Career - 1,300 Words At Bill Maher President Donald Trump posted the longest message of his social media career on Sunday night, a rant of more than 1,300 words on Truth Social aimed at HBO host Bill Maher, two days after Maher defended his second White House dinner with him on air. At just over 1,300 words, it's Trump's longest ever. "Let's talk about this COMPLETE AND TOTAL LOSER, Bill Maher," Trump began, calling Maher's show "Low Rated" on "equally Low Rated HBO." Later he called Maher a "major POTHEAD," a "coward" and a "dumb SLEAZEBAG," and closed: "You're not transformative, you're a Loser!" The trigger was Friday's "Real Time," Maher's first show since the dinner, which CNN dates to Oct. 15. Maher opened by telling his audience, "You know what? Fuck you. I like these dinners," and said he goes in and tells Trump "face-to-face" what he writes "in articles he'll never read." Maher posted the opening bit himself on X the next day, telling of the thrill of being announced at the White House with an aide saying, "Sir, your 7 o'clock low-ratings dummy is here." There is just something thrilling about being announced when you're in the White House, when you're outside the Oval Office, and you hear the aide say, "Sir, your 7 o'clock low-ratings dummy is here." pic.twitter.com/G6qUCsstNG — Bill Maher (@billmaher) October 24, 2026 Trump beef is apparently is over the evening itself. Maher says the dinner ran four hours; Trump says it lasted "two hours, maybe less," and that "We have the timestamps." He wrote that he "learned nothing, and felt it was a waste of time," and that Maher "invited himself." He also claimed Maher "was drunk and had alcohol in his hand as he walked through the White House." Maher had not answered that as of Monday. The post then wandered through a list of grievances with Maher's show. Trump said Maher "lied about all of the Illegal Voters" in California, adding "they found 20,000, and the number could easily go to over 1,000,000." He also said that Maher "attacked our Great Republican Candidates, when he knows my Endorsement Record is 98% in the House, and 100% in the Senate," and that the show was unfair to Karoline Leavitt, who appeared as a guest. Buried in the middle was a bit of actual news. "I am not building a swimming pool in the White House Briefing Room, and never had any intention of doing so," Trump wrote, "I am thinking about moving the Press, and putting them in a different location." CNN noted that the post confirms he has considered moving the press corps out of its White House workspace. He ended with orders. "Bill: Don't call anymore. It's useless," he wrote, said he would "never watch it again," and added, "I'm going to have the Republicans not cover you anymore." Maher had not responded as of Monday morning, and the White House simply pointed Fox News Digital back to the post. Critics on the left jumped on the length, with Mediaite rounding up reaction under the heading "Mental Deterioration!" It is a sharp turn from how Trump described the evening at the time. After the dinner, which also included Kid Rock and Stephen A. Smith, he told reporters Maher "likes me a lot more than people understand" and that it "was a very informative dinner," according to Fox News. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 15:40
60,000 Microsoft Workers Offered Buyouts As AI Spending Boom Reshapes Workforce Job cuts and downsizing announcements across corporate America have gained momentum, a trend we featured in a report last week titled "Tech Layoffs Surge As Corporate America's AI Blitz Raises Fears The Worst Is Yet To Come." Days later, Bloomberg reports that Microsoft will offer voluntary buyouts to about 60,000 employees while spending heavily on artificial intelligence and data center expansion. NEARLY 1 OUT OF 3 (60,000 EMPLOYEES) AT MICROSOFT BEING OFFERED VOLUNTARY TERMINATION Emails should be going out any minute to those receiving the offer. Absolutely insane. — LayoffHedge (@LayoffAI) October 26, 2026 "This offer gives eligible employees who may be considering a future outside the company a new choice to make that transition now with support," Chief People Officer Amy Coleman wrote in a memo earlier today. The memo cited by the outlet says workers on selected units in the US, Canada, India, and the UK at the vice president level and below will be eligible for the voluntary buyouts. Some employees in data centers, sales, and marketing are excluded. Benefits will match a standard severance package, according to the report. Bloomberg data shows Microsoft employed 223,000 people at the end of June and has cut thousands of jobs in recent years. The Big Tech firm's total workforce began to plateau in 2022. What we reported on Friday: The AI layoffs are here: *AMERICAN EXPRESS TO CUT 5% OF JOBS, ABOUT 3,500 EMPLOYEES *BARCLAYS TO CUT 5,000 JOBS AS AI STARTS CREATING EFFICIENCY *EBAY CONFIRMS JOB CUTS OF ABOUT 9% *NETFLIX TO LAY OFF 6% OF GLOBAL STAFF, OR ABOUT 1,000 JOBS: WSJ — zerohedge (@zerohedge) October 23, 2026 A deeper dive into layoffs across corporate America: Bloomberg story counts featuring terms such as "job cuts," “layoffs," and "firings" jumped Thursday to their highest level since early May. We're certain the worst is yet to come. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 15:20
Creepy Paid Democrat Propaganda Script Drops... Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity, Democrat-aligned influencers have flooded social media with near-identical videos accusing Elon Musk of trying to buy the midterm elections. The clips use the same phrasing, the same framing, and the same call to action. Accounts that normally post independent-sounding commentary suddenly received the same memo. Wall Street Apes highlighted the pattern, posting a compilation that shows multiple creators delivering the message in lockstep. The videos hit the same beats: Musk is trying to buy the elections, the effort is funded through government contracts, and viewers should tell him the country is not for sale. Different faces. Same lines. This right here is what paid propaganda looks like Democrat influencers are make videos using the exact same script, word for word, targeting Elon Musk saying he's buying the midterms elections Again, WORD FOR WORD. All Democrats have is paid propaganda. They rely on people believing their paid propagandists reading scripts for money — Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) October 23, 2026 Katie Miller flagged the coordination directly. She noted the undisclosed, paid nature of the talking points and asked which leftist dark-money group is behind the push. Undisclosed, paid, coordinated talking points. What leftist dark money group is paying for this? https://t.co/WGs0bGzQyh — Katie Miller (@KatieMiller) October 24, 2026 The core message appears across roughly a dozen accounts. The 'creators' state that the spending is paid for with taxpayer money tied to government contracts. They urge viewers to push back and declare that the country is not for sale. One account, Pullups Pasta Politics, has described itself as part of the Senate Communications Committee Creators Program. That detail raises the question of who supplied the language and who coordinated the distribution. This is not the first time the pattern has appeared. Earlier this year, Senate Democrats posted matching videos built around the same scripted lines ahead of a presidential address. The identical phrasing drew immediate mockery and was described as actors reading a script. Musk has become the largest known individual donor in the current midterm cycle. Reporting from outlets including the New York Times and others has placed his contributions in the range of $276 million to $366 million so far, with major sums directed to the Senate Leadership Fund and related Republican efforts. Those figures are public and drawn from FEC filings. Left-leaning commentary has framed the spending as an attempt to purchase control of Congress. The influencer videos amplify that framing with tightly matched language rather than independent analysis. Coordinated influencer drops allow a single message to appear as widespread public sentiment. The people delivering the lines may not disclose payment or central direction in the videos themselves. The result is a set of clips that look like organic outrage while tracking the same prepared text. Similar operations have been documented in Democratic-aligned creator programs that recruit accounts, provide content guidance, and distribute material across platforms. The current push arrives as polling and race-by-race reporting show competitive contests in several Senate and House seats. Framing Musk's disclosed donations as an illegitimate purchase of the elections is a clear messaging priority. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 15:00
Fed Over-Tightening: How Much Runway Is Left Before It Bites? Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com, The risk of Fed over-tightening rises when 5% Treasury yields, a thin savings cushion and a hike-cut-hike Fed all converge at the same time. The Fed raised rates in September, and the 10-year Treasury yield has since topped 5.3%, the highest since 2007. That combination raises a question the market isn’t asking loudly enough. If long-term rates are already doing the tightening, does every additional hike from here raise the risk of Fed over-tightening? I think the answer is yes. What’s more, the data suggest the “runway” before the damage shows up is shorter than most assume. On September 16, the FOMC voted 12-0 to raise the target range to 3.75%-4.00%, its first hike since 2023.1 The new dot plot puts the year-end rate between 4.1% and 4.4%. Markets now expect a hold at the October 28 meeting but still price roughly three-in-four odds of another hike by December.2 As I argued in why the Fed rate hike won’t fix the inflation it targets, the Fed’s tool works on demand and only demand. So the real question is where that demand is most exposed. Let’s take it in four steps. Is Strong Economic Activity Really Driving Inflation? Start with the activity data, because it’s genuinely strong. The ISM Services PMI printed 54.9 in September, with new orders at 59.8, while the manufacturing index came in at 54.5.3 Weight those 80/20 to reflect the economy’s services tilt and you get a composite of roughly 54.8. If activity drives inflation, readings like that should precede hot CPI prints. So, I tested it just to make sure. When you line up every monthly ISM Manufacturing reading since 2013 against CPI inflation nine months later, the relationship turns out to be far weaker than the “hot economy equals hot inflation” narrative assumes. Outside the pandemic window, the 37 months with a PMI of 55 or higher were followed by inflation averaging 1.6%. The only time strong activity preceded high inflation was mid-2020 through mid-2022, when stimulus checks collided with broken supply chains. Such is the problem with using 2021 as the template. Here’s where the data gets interesting. Activity correlates with the change in inflation at about 0.55. In other words, a strong economy nudges prices higher. It doesn’t set the level. That’s the “good inflation” component, and it’s REAL today. ISM respondents have listed GPUs and memory in short supply as AI spending strains capacity.4 The bigger driver, however, is the “bad” kind of inflation. Headline CPI jumped to 3.7% in September, while energy prices ran 20.4% above a year ago.5 Services firms are paying more for diesel and gasoline. That’s why the services prices index hit 74.0 in September, its highest since mid-2022. Good inflation in capex, bad squeeze on the consumer. The Fed’s hike does little to the first and a great deal to the second. Earnings Are Running Ahead Of The Economy That brings us to earnings. Topdown Charts’ S&P 500 earnings revisions pulse has surged to one of its highest readings since 2003. The average of the ISM manufacturing and services indexes, by contrast, sits only modestly above its norm.6 Historically, those two lines move together. When they split, they close the gap, either because the economy catches up or because revisions roll over. “Rising earnings support rising asset prices, so why worry?” If this were a historically normal economic cycle, that objection would carry the day. However, in today’s market, the issue is breadth. Earnings revisions are concentrated almost entirely in AI and capital spending sectors, where cash-rich hyperscalers barely notice a quarter-point rate hike. The newer, debt-funded cloud providers are another story, and October’s AI selloff showed how quickly that end of the trade can wobble. Notably, the FOMC itself described the backdrop this way: “Productivity growth is strong, and capital investment is robust.”- FOMC statement, September 16, 2026 While that is true, it’s also the problem. Currently, the Fed is tightening an economy whose strongest engine doesn’t need credit. However, the parts of the economy that do need credit are already straining from higher rates. At the same time, that 5.1% risk-free rate raises the bar every that equity multiple has to clear. So, earnings can rise even while valuations compress. We saw exactly that in 2022, when S&P 500 earnings held up through the year while the index fell roughly 19% as the 10-year yield climbed from about 1.5% to near 4%. The Consumer Is Spending Its Portfolio Point three is where I think the real risk of Fed over-tightening sits. For 15 years, rising markets quietly substituted for income growth. The JPMorganChase Institute, drawing on checking account data from more than 20 million Chase customers, now quantifies it.7 Net transfers from investment accounts into checking funded 2.3% of total spending in 2015. By April 2019, it was 3.5%. By April 2026, it was 6.8%, meaning that for every dollar American households spent this spring, nearly 7 cents came from selling stocks, bonds, and funds rather than from a paycheck. Among top earners, withdrawals have funded more than 10% of spending every month this year. Notice the interruptions. The trend dipped in early 2020, through most of 2022 and in early 2025, each time stocks fell. Then add a personal saving rate of 4.1% in August, the lowest since late 2022 after BEA’s annual revisions, a backdrop we covered in our look at consumer credit stress. The top 10% of earners drive roughly half of all spending, according to Moody’s. It funds a growing slice of that spending by selling assets. And the bottom half has almost no savings cushion. Some of this is demographic, and I’d be careful labeling all of it “stress.” Boomers drawing down retirement accounts is the decumulation I’ve written about before. Much of it is planned; however, the channel is the same regardless of motive. Higher rates pressure asset prices, lower asset prices shrink withdrawals, and smaller withdrawals shrink spending. The next recession probably doesn’t start with layoffs. It starts with a market decline that switches off the spending of the households that do most of it. How Much Runway Does The Fed Have Before Fed Over-Tightening Bites? Which brings us to history. After the 1991 recession, the Fed hiked aggressively in 1994 and cut in 1995 and 1996. It hiked once in 1997, then cut again in 1998 during the LTCM crisis. It then re-hiked 175 basis points between June 1999 and May 2000. The recession began in March 2001, 21 months after that re-hike started and just 10 months after the final increase. Today’s sequence has the same shape: hikes in 2022 and 2023, cuts in 2024 and 2025, and a re-hike in September. The table below lines up every tightening cycle since the late 1980s. Watch the last column. It shows how much tightening the bond market had already done when the Fed began hiking. The closest match to today’s starting spread is 1999, the one cycle that took the least time to break something. Since 1989, the average lag from the final hike to a recession has been about 14 months, with a range of 10 to 18 months.8 This brings us to the entire question of this article: how much runway is left? If the Fed delivers the rate hikes that the market currently expects, and history holds, it would be reasonable to expect economic troubles between late 2027 and mid-2028. However, I don’t trust that arithmetic this time. With the 10-year already near 5%, mortgage and corporate borrowing costs reflect a far tighter stance than a 3.875% funds rate would imply, and the Fed’s own estimate of neutral is near 3.1%. Add a consumer whose spending rides on the stock market, and transmission runs through prices that reset daily. I’m reasonably confident the lag will be shorter than the historical average. I’m far less confident about the exact month, and anyone claiming precision here is guessing. “The Fed doesn’t need to hike until something breaks. The bond market and a consumer living off its portfolio have already shortened the fuse.” Where The Bulls Are Right The bulls have a real case. The 1995 cycle ended in a “soft landing” even after the Fed doubled the funds rate in a single year, and the Fed’s own projections see unemployment at just 4.1% with solid growth. Productivity is strong, AI investment is running hot, and earnings keep beating. The Daily Shot’s long-history chart makes a fair point, too. A 5% 10-year yield is roughly the average since 1800 and well below the average since 1960. By that measure, rates are simply “normal” again, which is a view I share. A question that I have been repeatedly asked of late is: “If rates are normal, why would normal rates cause a recession?” Because “normal” is relative to the debt and the dependencies built during the abnormal years. Normal rates on a far larger debt stock, and on households that sell assets to spend, don’t produce a normal outcome. Such is the cost of 15 years of zero rates and QE. As we often state, when everyone thinks one thing will happen, something else usually does. Currently, the consensus sees little downside risk. What Fed Over-Tightening Risk Means For Investors Howard Marks has long made the point that you can’t predict, but you can prepare. That applies here more than usual. The risk of Fed over-tightening doesn’t argue for dumping equities, but it does argue for recognizing that the asset-price channel now matters more to the economy than at any point in the last cycle. A 10% to 15% decline would hit the economy harder than in 2018. It would directly cut spending by the top income cohort. In portfolio management terms, that means taking some actions today to protect against negative outcomes in the future. Rebalance winners to their target weights rather than chasing them. Keep exposure to rate-sensitive, consumer-dependent businesses measured. It also means respecting what a 5% Treasury yield offers patient investors. As my colleague Michael Lebowitz laid out in Whether the bond market has already done the Fed’s job, long rates hit housing, refinancing, and valuations with a lag, so much of that damage hasn’t arrived yet. The watch list is short. Track the 10-year above 5%, the ISM employment indexes, the JPMorgan withdrawal data, and the saving rate. When the withdrawal channel slows while the Fed is still hiking, that’s your signal. Bottom line:The bond market and an asset-dependent consumer have already done much of the Fed’s work, so each additional hike raises the risk of Fed over-tightening far faster than the historical lag suggests. The Fed is hiking to prove it can beat inflation. The danger is that it proves the point with the one economy that can’t afford to lose. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/26/2026 - 14:20




